Latest Issue

 
On the Cover from left: Wally Potts, Community Assets Manager Horowhenua District Council, Horowhenua Mayor Brendan Duffy, Nick Walmsley GHD, Rob Green Planning & Projects Manager Horowhenua District Council - at the Levin Wastewater Treatment Plant. 

Get the big picture – subscribe to NZ Local Government today.

Articles

Current Articles | Categories | Search

LGNZ says quake standards are ‘complex’


Local Government New Zealand says it supports a more stringent national standard for strengthening earthquake-prone buildings.

This statement follows yesterday’s release of the technical investigation into the structural performance of buildings in Christchurch by the Department of Building and Housing.

“A stronger national specification for strengthening older buildings avoids uncertainty. Currently the law only sets a minimum standard for retro-fitting earthquake-prone buildings.

“LGNZ believes this encourages building owners to just do the minimum for retro-fitting earthquake-prone buildings,” says LGNZ president Lawrence Yule.

Mr Yule adds that decisions on strengthening older buildings are complex, particularly when heritage buildings are involved.

“It can cost a lot of money to retro-fit an older building. People need to consider how much they value the older buildings in their community, and how that influences their concerns about building performance in an earthquake.

“This is about risk management – weighing up the desire to keep heritage buildings and the costs associated with them, with the potential for injury or loss of life in an earthquake.”

Mr Yule says this could mean some communities may choose longer compliance timeframes and LGNZ supports this.

LGNZ says central and local government now need to work together to clarify policy, and develop a mutual strategy for addressing earthquake-prone buildings.

Meanwhile, after the report of the technical investigation was criticised yesterday by the designers of the CTV building, the deputy chairman of the investigation panel says the report was “a very thorough piece of work”.

powered by metaPost

posted @ Friday, February 10, 2012

Previous Page | Next Page

COMMENTS

Currently, there are no comments. Be the first to post one!
Click here to post a comment
  
  Home \\  Council News \\  Opinion \\  Central Government \\  Professional Groups \\ 
  Asset Management \\  Case Studies \\  About \\  Subscribe \\  Advertise \\  Contact \\